Choosing the right control platform determines how effectively your users interact with technology and how easily you can scale, support, and maintain systems.
Before comparing brands, define what you need:
User experience: How simple should the interface be?
Scalability: Will this system expand across multiple rooms or sites?
Integration: Does it need to work with lighting, HVAC, or building management systems?
Budget and support: How available are local programmers and technical resources?
Crestron:
Best for enterprise-scale or complex environments needing deep customisation. Offers extensive control logic, network integration, and cloud connectivity.
Extron:
Ideal for standardised deployments such as classrooms or meeting rooms. Easier to configure and maintain with reliable hardware and simplified software tools.
AMX:
Suited for projects requiring flexible integration between AV, IT, and environmental systems. Strong in open architecture and network-based control.
Engage a vendor-neutral consultant to assess requirements.
Review lifecycle costs, not just initial hardware pricing.
Consider programmer availability and long-term serviceability.
Choose platforms that align with IT policies and security frameworks.
The best platform is the one that fits your operational needs not just the most powerful one. With a clear understanding of your space and users, you can select a system that delivers intuitive, efficient, and future-ready control.
Not sure which control platform suits your next project? Consult BPAV for independent guidance across Crestron, Extron, AMX, and more.